source-vie.org

Rich, there is no motivation to seize the colonies as sources of raw materials. Also Russia is serfdom country, the first bourgeois revolution in the time after the liberation of the serfs, it was a lot of cheap labor, do not need to grab the Russian slaves. The development of the Russian navy is not driven by economic motives, some .
Marine safety promotion and the direction of politically motivated push. Well, from the comparison of these two aspects, I conclude that the Navy’s development of a country must have economic motives. No economic, financial services, such as traction, and its development will be unstable. Be due to political factors, the leaders of the changes, the government changed the concept of .
Marine, or because of security changes in the environment, the Navy construction and impact by major setbacks. The other way round, if the construction of the Navy direct service of the nation’s economic construction, then build the Navy may be more stable, sustainable, long-term driving force. “Modern ships”: In our national and public opinion’s view, the navy seems to be .

Navy, from Peter the Great began to build the Navy, mainly for security. It is not for economic benefits. In addition to his land occupied territory, it does not have overseas colonies. Russian Navy has experienced five times major ups and downs, each followed by large-scale development are big decline. From Peter the Great to Catherine II, then 30 years .
Beginning in the 20th century, World War II, Stalin set a relatively large period of naval development. World War II just ended, Stalin also proposed a new shipbuilding program, including “Sverdlov” class cruisers, aircraft carriers also plan to develop. 5th time is the Gorshkov as the Navy Commander, the actual from the 60’s until the 80’s, 30 years of great .
Development and a great decline, this decline is the most pathetic, is caused by the disintegration of the Soviet Union. We found that the development of the Russian Navy is always in great twists and turns on, and why? Clearly, it does not grab the colonial economy as the markets, resources, it is a largely self-sufficient countries, resources are very .

Not vulnerable to political factors, political factors, fluctuations will not lead to large fluctuations occur naval strategy, so it can develop very long-term development program. You see, the U.S. development program to 2035, to consider it in 2004,2005 in 2035 things, it’s technology roadmap can see that far. Other Western powers the Navy, like the British, French naval equipment in .
Development, but also with almost the same period, 10 to 20 years, it can be more stable manner. Because of strategic stability, the stability of demand. Have long-term stability of the force structure needs and long-term promotion of political and strategic environment in the case of volatility, economic motivation is always very stable, it makes the Navy’s development of a .
Long-term driving force. This is a very large development of the Western Naval features “Modern ships”: You mentioned at the beginning another mode of Russia, how Russia’s navy has the characteristics of the development? Yin General: Russia itself from the 17-18 century, a relatively large independent state after its expansion is fundamental to the land expansion. The development of its .

Be such a phenomenon? Turn over, we found that the development of the Western powers the Navy has had two very important driving force, the direction of a national maritime security, a direction of development of marine interests. The development of the marine interests of the original direction is the development of Western countries, the fundamental driving force the Navy. .
The fundamental driving force is economic power. The main purpose of the establishment of the Navy is to open up overseas markets, to snatch a colony, plundering raw materials and labor, territorial expansion, when it is threatened when the sea route, it begins to protect the sea routes, the main purpose is to protect its economic interests. From the early .
Portugal, Spain to the UK, including France, the United States are in this way. “Modern ships”: economic motivation seems to be to push forward the development, particularly the development of the Western Naval important reason? Yin General: Yes. Western powers the Navy’s development, economic motivation has always been an important driving force, so the development of a large navy is .

Modern ships “: you submitted during the two sessions this year,” the development of national maritime strategy, planning for marine development and security plan, “the proposal, suggested that the state seize the time to develop,” 2030 National Oceanic and strategy. ” Impression, our country does not seem a highly developed national marine strategy. Cheuk Yin Chinese Navy Rear Admiral: Yes, .
Otherwise I would not mention, I thought I had made this proposal to talk about, since you are a naval magazine, I will focus on the Navy’s thinking. We note that the development of naval power, there are two phenomena, or model, one is the West, a Russia. The development of Western powers in the Navy before and after the .
End of the Cold War there are no major setbacks, although their strategic environment with Russia, as major changes have taken place. Including the British and French naval these second-largest country, their navy’s development, including force structure after the Cold War did not suffer major setbacks, they are very smooth transition over. But conversely, the Russian navy is plummeting, why .