source-vie.org

Core competencies or offshore, but the benefits of development required to distant sea. The needs of security and development interests are not the same. Mainly far as the South China Sea so many resources, light oil by foreign estimated to be about 270 to 400 in million tons, more than ten million cubic meters of natural gas. This great resource, .
I conservatively estimated at 20 trillion. Equivalent to 4 times our GDP. Such a large amount of resources is worth to develop. Also, oil transportation and trade routes are remote, and go the route of the northern Indian Ocean, oil, accounting for 60% of our oil imports over. This route accounts for foreign shipments over 1 / 3, because the .
EU is our largest trading partner. This route segment which is full of uncertainty, which we need to be able to maintain their own security, so the Navy must move away from the coast to protect our routes, trade routes safe. Need to explain that to maintain benefits, economic security is not military means are needed, but the military is .

Development of this piece not by much. Basically the security on behalf of the development. That meet the security needs, then surely meet development needs. In fact not the case, because the demand for development has brought a lot of new problems. If we simply from the physical point of view, the first one is wide. Because development involves not .
Only our surrounding oceans, many parts of the ocean are involved, including the South Pole, North Pole. Such as the Arctic, the Arctic region under international law is the common heritage of mankind, we have the world\’s population of 1 / 5, we can not be accounted for in the Arctic region is equivalent to the interests of our population? .
Whether we protect the Antarctic Division, 1 / 5 interest? Ocean seabed mineral resources, we can not get their rights? These rely on? Of course not rely on military power to protect it, but the overall development of our oceans is, our marine expeditions, fishing fleet, exploration ability can reach? Another is the distance from the distance. Our security interests, .

Be able to do with national security, to coordinate national economic construction. Now the central leadership’s understanding of the oceans is very clear. But without a number of regulatory things will affect the implementation of the strategy. Because the strategy is enacted, it is quite a long period of time guiding significance. The development of the navy can get a .
Long-term protection, difficult to be certain movements. So we want to have a regulatory thing, it is relatively stable, is also a manifestation of the rule of law. So I raised such a proposal to develop marine strategies. Then a concrete strategy to develop ocean, marine and maritime security strategy, development strategy, so that construction of our navy had a .
Long-term guidance. “Modern ships”: both the preservation of the marine safety at the same time safeguarding the interests of marine development, then the Chinese navy’s activities in the scope and capacity of system is also need to be changed? Yin General: Yes. Ability of our system over the past naval, force structure, which take into account the maintenance of the .

Largely on naval strategy. National Oceanic and development interests we are considering, the National Maritime Development to any place where there are no disturbances that? Is there a threat? Us navy combat zone to go to where? National Marine Safety Strategy sets out the mandate of the Navy, the Navy specifically requested. These can only come from the State. “Modern .
Ships”: the series and marine-related strategies to maintain our Navy’s long-term, stable and healthy development will play what role? General Yin: the development of our Navy military strategy based on the one hand to determine, on the other hand there are national security strategy. National Security Strategy of the direction of a national land-based security, national air and space security, .
But also the direction of the national maritime security. Therefore, it is both the National Marine Safety Strategy part of the national maritime strategy, is an integral part of national security strategy. No matter from which angle it down, all of our naval construction, and operational guidance. This strategy should be to clearly state, the development of our navy to .

The car unstable, the two wheels can be stabilized. A wheel is the direction of the security interests of the National Oceanic and another wheel development interests of the National Oceanic direction. The two wheels are indispensable. Chinese navy’s development is increasingly promoting the two wheels. The original is the wheelbarrow, then become a big wheel of a small wheel. .
The small wheels more complete, more and more. Did not solve the reunification issue, will not exceed our current development interests of security interests. Security interests has always been based, but the benefits of development will continue to expand. This case, the mission of our Navy should be made very clear. Safeguard the interests of the country’s development as an .
Important direction proposed. We need to safeguard the interests of the Navy completed the development of the strategic task should be made clear. This requires that countries have a regulatory document, is the national maritime strategy. With a clear maritime strategy, it underneath marine development strategy, maritime security strategy, then the Navy’s maritime security strategy that we developed was based .

Port throughput will reach such a level. Our foreign trade volume, as the minister at that time, Comrade Shi predicted that China’s foreign trade in 2010 could reach nearly 2 trillion U.S. dollars such a level. In fact we have reached 2.56 trillion in 2008. About 90% of our foreign trade is sea traffic, maritime logistics in about 2.3 trillion .
So much. Economies of scale as we expand our overseas resources and energy demand than we anticipated. This has resulted in our overseas interests, the interests of overseas direction is rapidly expanding, and expanding overseas interests requires the Navy to provide appropriate protection. “Modern ships”: You mentioned the Navy’s development of the motive one is security, an economic aspect, it .
Seems the Navy’s two fundamental missions. Then the rapid economic development, in particular the rapid development of export-oriented economy under the premise of the two missions should be between what kind of relationship, whether the two missions is the relationship between growth and decline? Yin General: analogy, Navy construction as a car, two wheels to promote it, a wheel of .

Taken, our economy will only gradually opened up. “Modern ships”: the expansion of economic interests is an indisputable fact, but our opinion regarding whether the economic benefits extend to what extent the concept seems to be lacking. Yin General: We have economic interests in the global expansion faster than those of us engaged in the Navy and Marine Research Strategy .
Comrades expected. For example, port throughput in 2000, about 18 million tons of time, we estimated that we will reach 2010 levels in Japan 1983-1984, about 30 to 32 million tons, this level was raised in Japan, two 1,000 nautical miles escort strategy, its naval and maritime equipment configuration in accordance with the requirements for basic. Security against the Soviet .
Union, it is also dependent on the U.S., but its economy is dependent escort of two 1,000 nautical miles, which is to protect its sea routes, the economic lifeline. We estimate that 2010 would be able to make this demand. But in reality, we are on port throughput in 2008 to 7 billion tons. Simply do not expect our nation’s .

A safety in the armed forces, has long been stressing the value of the Navy in terms of security, while the value of the benefits of development are rarely mentioned . Yin General: Yes. The development of our navy, basically before the reform and opening up security around the country. Of course, this is the military’s primary responsibility. Navy is .
The same Western powers. Navy shipbuilding cycle is very long, large investment, technical complexity. To promote the development of the main equipment of a type very strenuous, the Navy’s development with the national industrial and economic base are closely related. Although very slow start, the development of our Navy the past few years we all began to think faster with .
Our national economic interests are directly related to the expansion. We embarked on a world cycle, with more and more into the one of the world economy. In the reform and opening up, especially in the economic globalization, our loss was much greater than. The globalization of the economy, the present situation is an irreversible trend. Since such a path .

Rich, there is no motivation to seize the colonies as sources of raw materials. Also Russia is serfdom country, the first bourgeois revolution in the time after the liberation of the serfs, it was a lot of cheap labor, do not need to grab the Russian slaves. The development of the Russian navy is not driven by economic motives, some .
Marine safety promotion and the direction of politically motivated push. Well, from the comparison of these two aspects, I conclude that the Navy’s development of a country must have economic motives. No economic, financial services, such as traction, and its development will be unstable. Be due to political factors, the leaders of the changes, the government changed the concept of .
Marine, or because of security changes in the environment, the Navy construction and impact by major setbacks. The other way round, if the construction of the Navy direct service of the nation’s economic construction, then build the Navy may be more stable, sustainable, long-term driving force. “Modern ships”: In our national and public opinion’s view, the navy seems to be .

Navy, from Peter the Great began to build the Navy, mainly for security. It is not for economic benefits. In addition to his land occupied territory, it does not have overseas colonies. Russian Navy has experienced five times major ups and downs, each followed by large-scale development are big decline. From Peter the Great to Catherine II, then 30 years .
Beginning in the 20th century, World War II, Stalin set a relatively large period of naval development. World War II just ended, Stalin also proposed a new shipbuilding program, including “Sverdlov” class cruisers, aircraft carriers also plan to develop. 5th time is the Gorshkov as the Navy Commander, the actual from the 60’s until the 80’s, 30 years of great .
Development and a great decline, this decline is the most pathetic, is caused by the disintegration of the Soviet Union. We found that the development of the Russian Navy is always in great twists and turns on, and why? Clearly, it does not grab the colonial economy as the markets, resources, it is a largely self-sufficient countries, resources are very .